Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Centrifical Energy2 by preppy Centrifical Energy2 by preppy
:iconpreppy:

Centrifical Energy2 by preppy

/ / ©2003-2015 preppy
Version 2 I added some more action including some more renders brightened things up

comments favs appreciated!
Add a Comment:
 
:iconaxis-:
axis- Featured By Owner Mar 21, 2003   Writer
Sure itís not the best thing in the world, but holy shit you jealous comment whores need to lay the fuck off and go attack some of the lame ass furry shit that makes top favs. Dude its true you have made better, but who cares. Itís rather obvious that those who disliked it were rather jealous and felt youíre responsible for their lack of recognition; I think itís sad that they canít find a better way to let their jealousy out.

any way i like it.
Reply
:iconcaptain-ginyu:
captain-ginyu Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2003
Its okay, it could be better though. =/
Reply
:iconphade:
phade Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
allelic said it perfectly. Its not good looking unfortantly.....Sorry.
Reply
:iconnbak:
nbak Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003   Photographer
Not bad...dreamlike
Reply
:iconprotocol4:
protocol4 Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
dont see what the fuzz is about... not very special to me, and not very 'smooth' either...
Reply
:icondigitalmind:
digitalmind Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
I say what i see, it's just my opinion :) (Smile)

It's actually a great concept and idea, but there are some flaws in my opinion.

- Big sharp line in the left bottom, if rendered with an invisible background this wouldn't be a problem
- The render is nice, but should have had more detail for this idea.
- The render is jaggie on some parts.
- The center things shouldn't have been see through, but solid, with airbrushing on it, not under.
- The brushing looks really simple made, like its just a bunch of white stuff with a twirl over it.
- The blue is too much blue, and a bit overused blue, more to grey would have been better imo.

This is just my opinion though, it got many comments and fav's, so be proud of it, but with more time put into it, it would have been much better in my opinion :) (Smile)
Reply
:iconmercy:
mercy Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
yeah it's a nice wp,with a little thing a few new in the final render .
Reply
:iconeverex:
everex Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
anmzing gj cant wait 4 the next one bro +favs
Reply
:iconalphakx:
alphakx Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003  Professional Interface Designer
Sorry for the Dislike Deviation, but here are my reasons why Thumbs Down

Bullet; Blue There are layer edges left unerased and visible everywhere. I have no idea how you could've missed this while you were working on it.
Bullet; Blue Some weird ugly color tint is visble throughout.
Bullet; Blue The white effects look awful, and provide no light occlusions. In other words, the lighting of the white is too localized, and not graduated enough throughout the whole and effecting other parts. Other than that, the white portion just doesn't look too good.
Bullet; Blue The models, while nice, are too scattered and random and do not flow with eachother well.... the spatial placement of them creates too much negative space.
Bullet; Blue Too much shadows.
Bullet; Blue The background is flat, drab, and offers no sense of spatial depth.
Bullet; Blue The overall piece lacks color contrast. Seems like you stacked layer copies and used the Multiply blending mode. It's just not working here.
Bullet; Blue The detail is hindered due to the lack of contrast, and overall its blurry.

I think this was created out of haste. More ample time should've been spent correcting obvious flaws. I am very displeased this made the daily top favorites, and I hope the comments here and above from others don't anger you, but to help make you better. Keep working and trying.
Reply
:iconscorge:
scorge Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
The main reason that is somewhat is that at some places the Pixels are clearly visible it's not bad at first glimps but later on things like that can be irritating:-( (Sad) sorry but overall a great achievement:) (Smile)
Reply
:iconniteangel:
niteangel Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
nice idea, but the execution is somehow far from the best :o (Eek) the model is jaggy and it needs more details...it just needs some more work. I wonder why this is DTF, but it's not your fault ;) (Wink)
Reply
:iconneo-avs:
neo-avs Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
I really like the colors and the render, shading. I love this picture. Typo is... OK, 'coz it doesn't mean much to me. Detail is cool also.
But... the edges of some of the objects don't look good... maybe some anti-aliasing or bluring would help. But it gets a +fav and download nevertheless. :) (Smile)
Reply
:iconjmulder:
jmulder Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003   Interface Designer
nice work
Reply
:iconvylium:
vylium Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
Interesting renders.. some brush work could be better.. i dont like the typo..
Reply
:iconc-specter:
c-specter Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
wow, hey man, this wp kicks ass! :) (Smile) like the colors you used and the interesting render! =P (Razz)
Reply
:iconflinja:
flinja Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
try a little harder aye?

i can see blatant layers..

and i do hope your spelling error is supposed to be "clever"

Reply
:iconganga:
ganga Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
nice enough.. but a little low quality dont u think ? :) (Smile)
Reply
:iconass-itch:
ass-itch Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003  Professional Interface Designer
nice.
Reply
:iconandyhutchinson:
andyhutchinson Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003  Hobbyist Photographer
It's ok, but what kills it for me is the fact that you appear to have one of your renders in something like Soft Light mode in Photoshop, and then done nothing about the black matte edges of that layer, so you get this line right across the lower right of the image. If you render something like this with alpha, that all ceases to be a problem. Also, the white text would have looked so much better if you'd worked it into the object behind it, rather than just laying it over the top with a slight skew on it. Also, I don't if this was deliberate or not (nobody gives a shit about spelling any more), but you spell it 'centrifugal'. Still, keep on trucking dude, nobody ever got better by have nothing but meaningless praised heaped on 'em :) (Smile)
Reply
:iconv3fusion:
v3fusion Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
I like the mechanical parts a lot, but the center was jaggy and too "plonked", plus there is a layer mistake resulting in that line there. Some parts of the picture lack quality. If you could fix those, im it would be great. Nice concept.
Reply
:iconfucku:
fucku Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2003
great wallpaper+fav
Reply
:iconshadewind:
shadewind Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
the colors are great, but if you could lighten up things a little bit...
Reply
:iconaurae:
aurae Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
anti-aliasing anyone? colorbalance?
Reply
:iconmikhail-mik:
mikhail-mik Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
totally cool :D (Big Grin) wonderful!
Reply
:iconallelic:
allelic Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
he asks for them.


....and yes everyone tells themselves that we need attention. But he needs to learn to accept other opinions if hes asking for the attention.
Reply
:iconshadow-law:
shadow-law Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003   Filmographer
It isnt that bad imho, but its not his fault that it got alot of attention. Its people like you and me and others who favourite it.

And cmon, we all at some point in time enjoyed attention.


I think that this isnt bad at all.
Reply
:icondaemienwrath:
daemienwrath Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I like the concept and the content but:

Ok here is a few tips
1. About blurry if your used 3d Studio max, Use Catmull-rom with supersampling. (Anti Alias - Crisper, better, slower)
2. Lighting could have been a bit better placed and it feels like its been photoshoped - Bleh (Sorry to all those photoshop guys, I am a bit of a purist when it comes to lighting effects)

Well otherwise shweet
Reply
:iconviolation:
violation Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
^Harshly yet perfectly said I'm afraid.
Reply
:iconallelic:
allelic Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003

A shame....

"I reached my 5,000th today and i got DTF thanks guys thanks so much ecspecially the 45 people watching me"

For one thing, your views mean nothing and the amount of people watching you mean nothing, and this doesnt deserve the recognition it is recieving. Even if it did, DTF tells you nothing but that a few people who have no idea what they are talking about like it.

Learn to value the opinions that matter. With this said, my critique goes as follows:

-The lighting is terrible considering its pretty much overlapped on the image and is primarily focused on a particular spot of the image when light should be reflected in many areas.
-Things are extremly blurry
-You have a hard edge going straight across ur image on the bottom.
-Your background gives no depth
-Your image is completly cluttered and gives oppposite directions of flow (if ur purpose was intented to the direction of the center)
-If you compare your 'version 1' to this one, anyone can easily see that you basically flopped that layer and its outline on to this. Pretty sad.
-And finally, the image is very bland and has absolutely no detail or work that i can see of.

Reply
:icontcrud:
tcrud Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003   Writer
I think the white outline around the image takes away from it as a wallpaper. It's very...distracting.
Reply
:iconhvanova:
hvanova Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003   Interface Designer
nice, good job!!!
Reply
:iconsmashmethod:
smashmethod Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003  Professional Interface Designer
There are two types of circular motion:

Centripetal Force: Drawn towards the center.
Centrifugal Force: Pushed away from center.


Centrifical isn't a word.

The image is rife with errors too, but we won't get into that.
Reply
:iconshocks:
shocks Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
sweetness. love it alot. beautifull work :D (Big Grin)
Reply
:iconpodoped:
podoped Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
The middle ruined it 4 me
Reply
:iconviolation:
violation Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
Meh.
Reply
:iconendregan:
endregan Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
its okay but it doesnt really amaze me :/ sorry just how i feel!
Reply
:iconag-plus:
ag-plus Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003   Digital Artist
amazing 3d work man, great job
Reply
:iconatomical:
atomical Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
nice man

congrats on the dtf
Reply
:iconwolfwood:
wolfwood Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
points, laughs.
Reply
:iconamericean2k:
americean2k Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003   Digital Artist
renders look very basic and u can see the outline of the one layer.. theres a big rectangle of darker blue.. its alrite
Reply
:iconthe1prophecy:
the1prophecy Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
beautiful
Reply
:iconsnooger:
snooger Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
not bad...
Reply
:icondinyctis:
dinyctis Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
good concept the execution isnt that great

its jaggy, and there are a few layer edges that are distracting, like the one at the left.

other than that, not bad at all.
Reply
:iconmindgamez-420:
mindgamez-420 Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
great wish there waz more color.
Reply
:iconcentriod:
centriod Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
nice but the middle just does not do it for me. And I don't think the text on the right fits well in the image. And the mechanical arms or whatever they are hella ko0 but seem to dark for me. A little more improvement on this and it would be great. Keep up the good work

Reply
:iconblacksheep-:
blacksheep- Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
it's really nice, i like the colors and the 3d shapes

what i don't like is that the focal point is too blurred and the plastic texture doesn't look that good
also the foreground is too dark, but the pain thing is those white rings
Reply
:icondj-hack:
dj-hack Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003  Hobbyist Digital Artist
nice 3d preppy....Gj on the DTF
Reply
:icondr3:
dr3 Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
Nice one preppy but I dont like the transparency on the model like Syrogen said. Nice job tho! congrats on DTF
Reply
:iconoptimizer:
optimizer Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003   Digital Artist
very nice +FAV
Reply
:iconkopykat:
kopykat Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2003
Doesnt look sharp enough, a bit faded, a background would have added to this image alot. Nice concept :) (Smile)
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×
Download JPG 1280 × 1024

Featured in Collections




Details

Submitted on
February 5, 2003
Image Size
467 KB
Resolution
1280×1024
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
7,888
Favourites
29 (who?)
Comments
64
Downloads
574
×